<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advertising Standards complaints and adjudications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snappyname.co.uk/wordpress/advertising-standards-complaints-and-adjudications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snappyname.co.uk/wordpress/advertising-standards-complaints-and-adjudications/</link>
	<description>I wanted a snappy name but they'd all been taken</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy(ArT)Trigg</title>
		<link>http://www.snappyname.co.uk/wordpress/advertising-standards-complaints-and-adjudications/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy(ArT)Trigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 09:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snappyname.co.uk/?p=38#comment-364</guid>
		<description>This advert received 200 complaints but the company has withdrawn the ad volentarily and was withdrawn before any adjudication by Heinz themselves. &lt;a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4205422.ece" rel="nofollow"&gt;Heinz pulls mayonnaise ad over gay kiss furore&lt;/a&gt; 

There's a lot of controversy about it. Lot's of people are saying they will boycott Heinz products. Some because of anti-gay feelings, but gay-rights supporters are doing so because they are disgusted that Heinz have withdrawn it. There's even a petition to reinstate the ad &lt;a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/heinz/petition.html"Re-instate the Heinz Deli Mayo TV ad&lt;/a rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This advert received 200 complaints but the company has withdrawn the ad volentarily and was withdrawn before any adjudication by Heinz themselves. <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4205422.ece" rel="nofollow">Heinz pulls mayonnaise ad over gay kiss furore</a> </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of controversy about it. Lot&#8217;s of people are saying they will boycott Heinz products. Some because of anti-gay feelings, but gay-rights supporters are doing so because they are disgusted that Heinz have withdrawn it. There&#8217;s even a petition to reinstate the ad <a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/heinz/petition.html"Re-instate the Heinz Deli Mayo TV ad</a rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy(ArT)Trigg</title>
		<link>http://www.snappyname.co.uk/wordpress/advertising-standards-complaints-and-adjudications/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy(ArT)Trigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.snappyname.co.uk/?p=38#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Here's a complaint about a poster for the TV programme "Skins", full of sexy and provocative pictures. It's interesting to see that 42 people complained. I like the fact that even one complaint triggers an investigation - we have the power.

It's fascinating to me when I've seen the adverts concerned and think " I remember that". Then to see how many complained, and what about. 

Finally I find it interesting to see how the company defended itself and were they guilty or not guilty as charged.

&lt;a href="http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/adjudications/Public/TF_ADJ_44405.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt; ASA Adjudications. Channel Four Television Company Ltd t/a E4&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a complaint about a poster for the TV programme &#8220;Skins&#8221;, full of sexy and provocative pictures. It&#8217;s interesting to see that 42 people complained. I like the fact that even one complaint triggers an investigation - we have the power.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fascinating to me when I&#8217;ve seen the adverts concerned and think &#8221; I remember that&#8221;. Then to see how many complained, and what about. </p>
<p>Finally I find it interesting to see how the company defended itself and were they guilty or not guilty as charged.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.asa.org.uk/asa/adjudications/Public/TF_ADJ_44405.htm" rel="nofollow"> ASA Adjudications. Channel Four Television Company Ltd t/a E4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
